New 2025 H-1B Rule Lets You Be CEO and Visa Holder at the Same Time
The H-1B Modernization Rule
In late 2024, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
finalized a rule titled “Modernizing H-1B Requirements, Providing Flexibility
in the F-1 Program, and Program Improvements Affecting Other Non-immigrant
Workers.” It was published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2024, and
took effect on January 17, 2025.
This is commonly referred to as the H-1B Modernization Rule
(or 2025 H-1B Final Rule). It is not a new law passed by Congress but a
regulatory update by DHS/USCIS that revises existing H-1B program rules under
the Immigration and Nationality Act. It aims to streamline processes, add
flexibilities (especially for employers and certain workers like entrepreneurs
and F-1 students), clarify definitions (e.g., “specialty occupation”), codify
some prior policies (like deference to prior approvals), and strengthen program
integrity and oversight.
Key broader changes in the rule include:
- Updates
to the definition and criteria for “specialty occupation.”
- Clarifications
on employer-employee relationships:
- The
2025 H-1B Modernization Final Rule revised the definition of a
"United States employer" by:
- Removing
the previous requirement to establish a common-law
"employer-employee relationship" (i.e., the petitioner’s right
to hire, supervise, fire, and control the beneficiary’s work).
- Replacing
it with clearer, more flexible criteria: The petitioner must have a
legal presence in the U.S., an IRS EIN (tax ID), be amenable to service
of process, and extend a bona fide job offer for the beneficiary to work
in the U.S. (including remote/telework).
- Expanded
cap-exemptions for certain nonprofits and affiliated entities.
- Revised
Form I-129 requirements (a new edition became mandatory on the effective
date with no grace period).
- Explicitly
clarified, codified, and expanded the ability for a U.S. company owned or
controlled by the foreign national beneficiary to file an H-1B petition on
their behalf. This is called the “beneficiary-owner” or owner-employee
rule.
- Other
flexibilities, such as for F-1 OPT students.
The Beneficiary-Owner Provisions
Prior to the rule, USCIS required
a clear employer-employee relationship, meaning the petitioning company had to
demonstrate the right to hire, supervise, fire, and control the beneficiary’s
work (based on common-law principles). When the beneficiary owned a controlling
(or 100%) interest, this created a perceived conflict: the owner was
essentially supervising themselves. Adjudicators frequently denied such
petitions or issued Requests for Evidence (RFEs) demanding strong evidence of
separation, such as:
- A
board of directors or investors with real oversight power.
- Formal
employment contracts, performance reviews, and governance structures.
- Evidence
that the company operated independently of the owner’s personal
decisions.
Sole proprietorships almost never worked (no legal
separation). Even corporations/LLCs faced high denial risks due to “ambiguous
policy” and discretionary scrutiny.
The 2025 rule changed this by:
- Expanding
the definition of a “U.S. employer” (legal presence in the U.S., IRS EIN,
ability to be served process) and removing/revising the strict
employer-employee relationship language in relevant contexts.
- Explicitly
stating that ownership alone does not disqualify someone, while still
requiring all other H-1B criteria (specialty occupation, qualifications,
prevailing wage, etc.).
- Adding
safeguards for program integrity: Initial approval and first extension
limited to 18 months each (subsequent extensions up to 3 years).
Main features of the Beneficiary-Owner Provisions
- A
U.S. company (the petitioner) that is owned or controlled by the foreign
national (the beneficiary) can file an H-1B petition on their behalf.
- “Controlling
interest” generally means the beneficiary owns more than 50% of the
company or holds majority voting rights.
- The
company must still qualify as a valid “U.S. employer” (legal presence in
the U.S., IRS EIN, ability to be served process, etc.). A corporation or
LLC is a separate legal entity, so the company (not the individual) is the
petitioner, even if the beneficiary owns 100%.
- Sole
proprietorships typically do not qualify because they lack
separation between owner and business.
- All
standard H-1B requirements still apply: The position must be a “specialty
occupation”, the beneficiary must meet qualifications (e.g., relevant
degree or equivalent), there must be a bona fide job offer, and prevailing
wage rules must be followed. The employer must demonstrate the ability to
hire, supervise, and control the employee’s work (e.g., via board
oversight or governance structures in startups).
Special validity periods for beneficiary-owners
- Initial
petition: Up to 18 months.
- First
extension: Up to 18 months.
- Subsequent
extensions: Up to 3 years (with the usual 6-year total maximum, extensions
possible in certain cases).
“Specialty occupation” requirement
The beneficiary must perform “specialty occupation” duties
for a majority of their working time, that is, more than 50% (often described
as at least 51%). Examples of common specialty occupations include engineers,
scientists, IT professionals (e.g., software developers), accountants,
architects, doctors, lawyers, and certain management or business roles that
require highly specialized knowledge.
For beneficiary-owners, the core role (e.g., CTO, lead
software engineer, financial analyst) must qualify as a specialty occupation
and occupy the majority of time, even if the person also handles CEO/founder
responsibilities.
This is a standard H-1B requirement for all petitions, not
limited to the beneficiary-owner (owner-employee) provisions of the 2025 H-1B
Modernization Final Rule.
Setting up a US company
How many shareholders/directors?
Minimum number of shareholders: 1 (one).
Under the 2025 H-1B Modernization Rule, a single foreign
national can own 100% of a valid U.S. company (LLC or corporation) and have
that company petition for his H-1B as CEO/CTO/software engineer in a specialty
occupation. There is no minimum number of shareholders or members required. The
company must be a separate legal entity (not a sole proprietorship), have a
legal presence in the U.S., an IRS EIN, and be amenable to service of process.
- LLC:
Can be a single-member LLC.
- Corporation
(C-Corp or S-Corp): Can have a single shareholder.
Sole proprietorships do not qualify because there is no
legal separation between the owner and the business.
Best place to incorporate: Delaware is by far the most
popular and recommended choice for this scenario.
Why Delaware?
- Highly
business-friendly laws with maximum flexibility for small/startup
companies.
- One
person can be the sole director, officer, and shareholder/member.
- Strong
privacy protections and a well-established court system (Court of
Chancery) that investors and USCIS recognize favorably.
- Easy
to form remotely (no need to be in the U.S.).
- Standard
choice for tech startups and companies planning to raise funding later.
- You
can register the company in Delaware and then qualify it to do business in
another state (e.g., California or New York).
Other options like Wyoming or Nevada are sometimes used for
privacy/tax reasons, but Delaware is the gold standard for H-1B/startup cases.
Board of directors: 1 person is legally sufficient, and no
independent board is strictly required under the new 2025 rule.
Practical Recommendations for Improving the Odds of an
Even though the H-1B Modernization Rule removed the old
strict “common-law employer-employee relationship” barrier and explicitly
allows controlling-interest (50%+) owners:
- Having
at least 1–2 additional board members or advisors (even non-voting or
family/friends) is still highly recommended by many immigration attorneys.
It demonstrates that the company operates as a legitimate separate entity
with some oversight.
- Include
a formal employment contract, organizational chart, board resolutions (if
applicable), and clear evidence that you will spend the majority (>50%)
of your time on specialty occupation duties (e.g., software
engineering/CTO work, not just general CEO/founder tasks).
Conclusion:
This change has made it significantly more feasible for
founders, startup CEOs, and self-employed professionals to use H-1B status
through their own companies, which was more uncertain or challenging under
prior interpretations. It promotes entrepreneurship while requiring evidence of
a legitimate employer-employee relationship. Nevertheless, USCIS will still
scrutinize the petition for a bona fide specialty occupation, ability to pay
the prevailing wage, and legitimate business operations.
Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Immigration and corporate rules can be nuanced based on each person’s specific situation. Please consult a U.S. immigration attorney experienced in beneficiary-owner H-1B cases and a business attorney/CPA for entity formation and tax setup (LLC vs. C-Corp has major tax and fundraising implications).

Comments
Post a Comment